| It worked already. Haven't you noticed the
change in the media accounts? I
have, anyway.
And now the judge is on notice. She is
undoubtedly sincere and
trying to be fair, and
she may not be aware that she isn't being
perceived that
way. In one Wall St. Journal article
I can't find at the moment, she was quoted
as
saying in court that both sides were being treated
equally as to being denied
if late. I'll check
that, but for sure they are not being treated
equally in
everything. She may become a lot more
conscious of this matter now, and that is
a good
thing.
In my experience, people who have a bias never
see it in
themselves, unless an outsider tells them
that it's so. Then they deny it, and
if they are
a bit deeper than average, sometimes they'll
think about it some
more and realize it's so.
We'll see what she does going forward. But for
sure,
it's good for the appeal that the entire
matter is in the record. If there
wasn't such a
big fuss, it wouldn't have been in the record.
I'm sure Quinn
thought of that in advance. It
was a bold move, for sure. He took a chance,
but
he was also careful. In his filing with the
court, for example, he pointed
out that it was
Samsung the company that put out the statement,
not him
personally. So, how do you sanction him?
Maybe because he OK'd it. But that's
a bit thin,
so maybe he's just a lot more experienced than
the judge. I'm just
saying. I don't know
all the ins and outs, so we are just guessing,
but that is
possible, that he factored in a
relatively green judge. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
