no doubt you view my little comment on this issue as
sophomoric and
obtuse.
but if you want to get philosophical about it, it could be
viewed
that the judiciary's purpose is to curb chaos.
To curb this chaos it is not
necessary to school the
participants in relativistic theory that the perception
of
events is dependent on the observers cultural bias or that
the perception
of the same event(s) may be honestly
remembered differently by different
people. These could-be
anomalies are to be resolved in the judicial setting as
a
matter of course.
But what I really object to is the conclusion by the
purveyor of the relativistic vision of history is this...
I hope
the jury were taught enough of this basic
philosophy
to see that both parties
are right, and both are wrong, and
neither deserve a penny
In the
real world sometimes there really is a bully beating
up on some other kid.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|