decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Obama appointment | 227 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Samsung missed the timeline...
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 03 2012 @ 04:10 AM EDT
... Apple didn't. That seems to be the problem here. But
nonetheless, to disallow them from showing such crucial
information is very worrying.

I think it will be easy for Samsung to appeal, if they lose;
the judge ruled against them in a number of ways that should
raise eyebrows.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

something really really important missing
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 03 2012 @ 04:19 AM EDT
Mystery - with this judge ?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

They are missing a phone
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 03 2012 @ 09:09 AM EDT
I have and still use a Samsung SGH-i900 (not sold in the US; however, Verizon
sold a SCH-i910 in the US). This phone was release in Aug 2008 (post iPhone)
but it looks a lot like the original iPhone.

http://pdadb.net/index.php%3fm=specs&id=1328&c=samsung_sgh-i900__sgh-
i908_omnia_16gb

PS: It's still a good phone; I've used it on GLOBE (Philippines), AT&T (US),
and it's
currently on T-Mobile (US). It's a GSM only phone.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Obama appointment
Authored by: cjk fossman on Friday, August 03 2012 @ 10:26 AM EDT
Sadly it seems our current president has become a defender
of Most Holy California IP.

He seems to consider us little folk only when we appear at
his front gate bearing torches and pitch forks.

I'm not a one-issue guy, but the behavior of the Obama
administration is coming close to being a deal breaker.

Just so there's no confusion, let me say I'll sit out the
election rather than vote for a vulture capitalist.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Koh granted the injunction
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Friday, August 03 2012 @ 01:09 PM EDT
On the Samsung Galaxy Nexus and Tab.

Basically on the word of Apple.


---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )