decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Lack of copyright == good | 98 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
But Wait, There's More
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 09:18 PM EDT
A rectangular shape, with rounded corners,
> the broken lines are for the purpose of illustrating portions of the
> electronic device and form no part of the claimed design.

The solid lines indicate the "ornamental" design
of the wedge shape of the Macbook Air.

Patent number: D661296
Issue date: Jun 5, 2012

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Games run FASTER on Linux than Windows
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 10:05 PM EDT
The Register reports Valve claims Games run FASTER on Linux than Windows. It may not be the magic bullet, but it is one more brick in the wall.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Off Topic
Authored by: Tufty on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 10:23 PM EDT
Thanks for helping keep things tidy.

---
Linux powered squirrel.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Lack of copyright == good
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 10:44 PM EDT
Did Germany experience rapid industrial expansion in the 19th century due to an absence of copyright law? A German historian argues that the massive proliferation of books, and thus knowledge, laid the foundation for the country's industrial might.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/no-copyright- law-the-real-reason-for-germany-s-industrial-expansion-a-710976.html
The above story just turned up on HuffingtonPost although it appears to be a couple of years old.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

When business conspires to set standards
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 11:36 PM EDT
This latest attack on the DSM-V comes nearly a year after UBC law professor Joel Bakan delivered a withering exposé in his book Childhood Under Siege: How Big Business Targets Children.

He cited a study showing that every member of DSM-IV panels on mood disorders, schizophrenia, and other psychotic disorders had ties to at least one pharmaceutical company.

Furthermore, Bakan pointed out that the creator of the modern DSM system, Robert Spitzer, and the researcher who oversaw the DSM-IV, Allen Frances, believe that the DSM-V "could push psychiatry even deeper into the arms of the pharmaceutical industry by including, as it likely will, subthreshold (such as mild depression) and premorbid (such as prepsychotic) categories".

Charlie Smith, Georgia Straight

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

In-court tweeting only by accredited journalists and lawyers? That smells of judicial snobbery
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 03 2012 @ 12:17 AM EDT
The decision by B.C.’s two trial courts to allow in-court tweeting only by accredited journalists and lawyers smells of judicial snobbery.

There’s no good reason anyone with a legal degree, along with me and my ilk, should be allowed to fire off email and 140-character notes from a courtroom while an ordinary joe gets the bum’s rush from the sheriff.

The new policy, effective Sept. 17, is an attempt by the still-archaic provincial and Supreme Court benches to look more accommodating to the 21st century.

They add it will also inspire greater confidence in the courts as an essential institution of democracy.

I say it will engender the opposite — the feeling they remain out of touch.

Ian Mulgrew, The Vancouver Sun

---

This policy sets out the permitted and prohibited use of electronic devices in courtrooms of the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court and the Provincial Court of British Columbia.
.PDF / 3 pages -- POLICY ON USE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES IN COURTROOMS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )