decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple Seeks a Win by Asking the Judge to Sanction Samsung ~pj | 98 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
More like Dewy, Cheatum, & Howe n/t
Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 06:51 PM EDT
.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple Seeks a Win by Asking the Judge to Sanction Samsung ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 07:12 PM EDT
I was thinking that the judge should rule that for this specific case, Apple's
patent is valid, but in all future cases, Apple's entire patent portfolio is
null and void, issued by the USPTO in violation of US Statute Law and US Case
Law on what constitutes a legitimate patent.

Consequently, this case is dismissed with prejudice, with both sides paying
their own fees, and Apple being awarded one mil United States Currency in
damages in this case, but that award changes to Apple paying Samsung
US$1,000,000 for each motion filed in every other litigation between the two
parties, that the parties are either currently engaged in, or file within the
next 180 months.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Hail Mary Pass; Give Us the Game, Forget Scoring a Jury Win! :D
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 11:25 PM EDT
So Apple is trying to change the scoreboard in their favor.
A win without ever having to go the length of the field to
score any Touchdowns! haha...

They don't even give 100yd Penalties in football. lol.. How
in the World do they expect the fans in the stands or the
officials in the Press Box (jury) to render their decision
without having heard it yet? Wow... must think they deserve
to win without even really touching the football. Judge?
Just swing your gavel in our favor already!:O

Gee.... I think every legal litigant in the World wishes
they forego the trial, just to claim instant victory! :DDD

btw.... Apple's must have already chewed off all their
fingernails and don't have anything left to chew on! hehe...
FREAKING OUT at GAME TIME!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )