|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 01:11 AM EDT |
That is what apple says. Do you dare to bet on it?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 01:35 AM EDT |
Just as Apple designed the bitmapped screen and user display
on the Lisa, like Xerox would have done if they had another
chance. That is really just a diversion, consistent with all
the other misleading statements from the Apple side.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 02:09 PM EDT |
Apple has been calling the 'Kettle' black for ages, and I think
maybe you, Apple and Steve had/have been smoking a little too
much 'Pot'. Maybe you've all become that which you've accused
Samsung of doing? ;-P
....and don't realize it, yet.
Anyway showing prior art has now become Samsung's only defense.
Because this Judge has removed the only concrete evidence that
the F700 was indeed developed and engineered independent of the
iPhone. One... by the sheer fact that it's design patent had
been applied for in Korea by December 2006 and Two... refusing
to allow Samsung's attorneys to show their own prior art on
it's F700 design.
And in case you don't get it..... that's before iPhone was
publicly released in January 2007. It hadn't even gone into
production yet either. So was iPhone style actually chosen
after Apple saw that F700 or those Japanese Design patents? In
fact the F700 even went on sale a month before original iPhone
went on sale! ^_*
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 02:47 PM EDT |
Why are you trying to insert these falsehoods here?
We are talking about a pre-iPhone Samsung design not
about how Apple was inspired by Sony (a historic fact
admitted by Steve Jobs on numerous occations).[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: designerfx on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 03:05 PM EDT |
This isn't really at matter. Samsung's just providing a small
leading example. The reality is that they've been developing
phones for years and years beyond apple as they highlighted,
so apple trying to claim they invented anything involving a
rectangular cellphone is nothing but a false statement to
begin with.
Innovated? Got the public to purchase it? Absolutely. Created?
Apple has no history of creation of new products. Not now, not
ever.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
