decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Slavish copying and irony | 256 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Slavish copying and irony
Authored by: the_flatlander on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 01:15 PM EDT
>> My personal irony meter is on overload. <<

You got that right. This litigation actually *broke* mine a while back. (I'm
sure that's a tort, by the way, and I'm currently looking for a law firm to help
me recover damages, and a publisher to help me sell my story.)

Apple's [fictional] story sells well enough among folks who have lately arrived
in the gadget market, but to those of us that grew up before PCs, but
never-the-less dreamed of the day computers would be as ubiquitous as they are
now, their tale sounded like an obvious lie from the first time they started
telling it.

The inexplicable part is that Apple is suing Samsung. I mean, this tactic
*might* work against a small rival, and it might work if the US were the biggest
piece of the smart phone market. But Samsung is large, and they are global.
They sell in markets Apple will never, ever sell in. The only people who stand
to *lose* in this litigation are U.S. consumers who may find themselves, if
Apple wins, separated from a decent product at a decent price.

And, PJ's right; I had been thinking, recently, about buying a MAC Book for a
loved one who finds Linux inconvenient, (because of a real, and unfortunate,
need to run lots of proprietary garbage-ware)... I'm actually thinking I'd
rather buy a laptop running that *other* product. [shudder] In any case, Apple
won't be getting any of my money, for anything, ever.

The FlatLander

I'm hoping that Apple gets their iBackside handed to them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple BOUGHT IP from Xerox PARC
Authored by: jcr6 on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 01:31 PM EDT
Let's not rewrite history.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Slavish copying and irony
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 02 2012 @ 03:44 PM EDT
The Xerox PARC story is mostly a myth. Apple had already started development of
the Lisa and Mac computers before Apple visited Xerox. The point of the visit
was not to be exposed to new technologies, but to reinforce (for Jobs) that it
was not only a few Apple engineers who were on this track.

The technologies "revealed" had been around for many years and Xerox
had been happily showing them off to just about anyone who cared to see them.
Apple has never claimed that they invented the GUI or the mouse.

Not defending Apple, just trying to make sure the facts are truthfully
represented.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )