decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
...When software is Patentable | 216 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
...When software is Patentable
Authored by: argee on Wednesday, August 01 2012 @ 09:51 PM EDT
I like the way you put, better than mine.

But several things done with computers could be patentable.

In the are of machine control, it is possible that the
human synapses etc would not make it possible for a human
to do the control thing, therefore a computer (and its
software, of course) is the only possibility.

Business methods, etc. are clearly not in this realm. Just
because you want to fire old Fred, the dusty bookeeper,
that does his job at the rate of 2 customers per minute,
does not make patentable a computer software that can
do 20,000 customers per minute.

But say, a flight control system where a thrust vector
of a fraction of a second would not even be discernible
to a human, but, in fact is essential to, say, a lunar
lander or a mars rover, or a rocket launch, or a
simulated bird where every 'feather' is tied to a sensor,
*might* qualify.

I always figured it thusly: Remove the Computer. Is the
end result can still be made to work, then it is not
patentable. By computer, I mean a general purpose
computer, like a Mac, PC or Linux running on a stock
computer and peripherals. Special hardware that is not
off the shelf, but created --and programmed-- specifically
for the purpose are a different animal.


---
--
argee

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )