|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 30 2012 @ 06:18 PM EDT |
As the poster below wails, waaaay tooo many motions to seal.
'Bout time for Judge Koh to do a Posner - all paper open on the table,
or else it's case dismissed with prejudice.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 30 2012 @ 06:20 PM EDT |
According to a tweet from @martyn_williams:
"A court has denied IBM's attempt to prevent Reuters from
publishing details of licensing agreement with Samsung.
#iCourt"[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 30 2012 @ 06:22 PM EDT |
How is releasing the terms of an agreement good in the long
term for IBM? It is really bad in the short term as it will
affect negotiations with other entities if they knew the terms
of agreements with Samsung. In the long term, it's meh.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- We don't know, - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 30 2012 @ 06:28 PM EDT
- Game strategy - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2012 @ 11:24 AM EDT
- Game strategy - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2012 @ 02:35 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 31 2012 @ 08:39 AM EDT |
I see a IBM cartoon with IBM having a fire extinguisher in one hand and a can of
gasoline in the other.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
