decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The Irony | 179 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Irony
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 29 2012 @ 11:01 AM EDT
You also need to pick low footprint applications also for a low spec computer.
Use Chrome instead of Firefox etc. For example, Lubuntu is a distribution that
picks low requirement applications for the default. By being careful what you
install after you install Lubuntu or some of the other Tiny (Distros) Linux will
work with a tiny footprint even with a GUI environment.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Irony
Authored by: UncleVom on Sunday, July 29 2012 @ 11:56 AM EDT
I think it is pretty hit and miss depending on the mix of hardware.

I also think that KDE comes with too many graphics "bling things"
turned on by default. What makes it more visually appealing for hardware less
than 5 years old can quickly kill the performance on older hardware.

I have it (4.8.4) running on an EeePC 1000HE with 2GB ram and it works fine,
sure it runs slower than my quad core desktop, but IMO it is perfectly useable.

I had it running on a Intel Atom motherboard with pretty
similar specs on paper, it was a slow old dog, and it is somewhat better with
XFCE4.

I tried it on my wife's older Toshiba laptop and it was pretty much unusable
even with the "eye candy" effects turned off, but it works fine with
LXDE.

The really weird one is a older Athlon 2400XP with 1GB of RAM and a ATI 9600,
KDE 4.8.4 runs very well on this and the thing is ancient.

I also have it as an option on, a cheap originally and now pretty much
worthless, HP desktop with a late Pentium 4, integrated Intel graphics and 512MB
of ram. It runs acceptably as long as most of the "eye candy" is
turned off, I'd say faster than its original Windows XP.

Another option which may speed up KDE for older boxes is to run it on Openbox,
this is an automatically included "LogIn Menu" item for Debian KDE
installs these days, but may require manipulation and additional packages for
other distros.

So I guess what I'm saying is that for some less powerful or aging hardware KDE
4 may run OK with some tweaks and for some it can be a lost cause.

When my Raspberry Pi finally shows up, I'm maybe, could be, not even going to
try KDE. ;-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )