decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Roger Fidler Refused to Patent his 1981 Invention! | 126 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Roger Fidler Refused to Patent his 1981 Invention!
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 27 2012 @ 07:43 AM EDT
But yes indeed, Roger and Knight-Ridder should own the Copyrights even though they never endeavored to apply for patents
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe that copyright law allows the copyrighting of a device design to the point of disallowing others to build the device. You can copyright the design so that others cannot make copies of the design itself without your permission, just as you can copyright a recipe, but you cannot keep others from implementing that design, just as you cannot keep others from making the food described in the recipe.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Roger Fidler Refused to Patent his 1981 Invention!
Authored by: PJ on Friday, July 27 2012 @ 07:51 AM EDT
Thank you for this. I've updated the article.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Roger Fidler Refused to Patent his 1981 Invention!
    Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, August 03 2012 @ 03:05 PM EDT
    Wow.

    Exhibits B-D ("The 1981 Tablet") - Behold the first Tablet PC: a rectangular block of plastic with a sheet of paper glued to it (and not well).

    Exhibit G Video of "The 1990 Tablet" - non-functioning mock-up
    Exhibit H Forbes article with an image of 1990 Tablet - shows improved glue technology

    He gets extra credit for basically claiming that Alan Kay (as an Apple Fellow) stealing the tablet idea from him when he saw it.

    Now for the well published "The 1994 Tablet and Video"

    13. In 1994, while at the IDL, I designed and produced another tablet mockup ("the 19 1994 Tablet"), photographs of which are attached as Exhibits I-K.
    Wait, what? Mockup? Didn't the OP promise "a demonstration of a working tablet device"?

    So what do we see in Exhs. I-K? Well, something that looks quite like tablets later actually developed, and yes, it does have the promised rounded corners. But it is quite clear that the front face surface is not flush - unlike that of the iPad (and the Samsung Tabs) and as claimed in the design patent. Oh yeah, and the whole thing is stylus operated.

    Lars T.

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )