decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
"two Packet Radio networks" - prior art, to anything? | 126 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
"two Packet Radio networks" - prior art, to anything?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 27 2012 @ 06:50 AM EDT
"two Packet Radio networks"...

That is, what it is. Computers TX and RX over wireless,
simply a networking concept. Nothing really new.

Then, when the USPTO issues patent on what is basically
this, it shows how ignorant that the USPTO really is about
tech.

Doing email or any other computing function that has been
around a long time (albeit, today with a different paint job
GUI, that is all it is, is art on top of tech), well, those
doing it make it sound so NEW? It is not. It is old. Too
old to have any patents.

Too bad that judges and lawyers are so easily fooled (as
stupid as the USPTO is).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Who invented the internet?
Authored by: YurtGuppy on Friday, July 27 2012 @ 08:32 AM EDT
If I'm clued in correctly, the recent kerfuffle about the "invention"
of the Internet came out of President Obama's speech which generally laid
personal success at the feet of collective action.

WHO invented it is a strawman, in my opinion. His statement was that the
internet was put in place by collective action as a means to profit businesses.


As far as I can tell there is no historical evidence that the internet was
developed for that purpose (except maybe
for forward-looking statements attributed to Al Gore). I'm sure there were
multiple purposes, but the original excuse for spending the money was advanced
research in support of military objectives.

Conversely, remember that business was expressly kept out of the Internet until
the early 1990's.

But keeping business off of the Internet was a formality since anywhere that
people communicate they use that communication to facilitate interaction and
trade. Yesterday's usenet swap group became today's Craigslist and Ebay.



---
a small fish in an even smaller pond

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )