decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
How much harm does taking him seriously do, though? | 276 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
How much harm does taking him seriously do, though?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 26 2012 @ 01:27 PM EDT
People do take him seriously. That's why they quote him.
That's not the only reason and I suspect sometimes it's not even a main reason. One reason is that he provides an easy and interesting quote. Reporters quote defense attorneys saying that their the client looks forward to their day in court and that they expect to be vindicated even when it's obviously not so. I suspect something similar happens with FM sometimes.

I have no problem with the article. It was written in a way that wouldn't help FM. How to manage your time is your decision, not mine. If you see the need for such an article, by all means write it.

Not that the person I was responding to was advocating it, but what really bothers me is that I often see people becoming angry at FM and doing things that wind up helping his cause. Calling FM "stupid" and trying to prove that he is stupid is counterproductive. As you know, he is certainly not stupid; he is quite clever and is a good propagandist. (For example, he implies or suggest ideas without actually saying them if he's too likely to be called out on them.) I don't really expect FM to be completely ignored. (I would be a hypocrite if I said that he should be.) I just think people need to think twice before engaging him in battle, or ranting about what he says, though. He should be handled calmly, intelligently, and with moderation.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )