Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Automated spam bot | 276 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Automated spam bot

Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 11:52 AM EDT

Yes, he is, if you will, a skilled propagandist or
lobbyist. There's no doubt about that.

And if he advertised himself as such, I'd be
fine with that.

Then at least people would know what they are
getting.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Automated spam bot - Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 07:48 PM EDT
- Automated spam bot - Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 08:10 PM EDT
  - Automated spam bot - Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 09:34 PM EDT
Automated spam bot - Authored by: Scott_Lazar on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 08:18 PM EDT

Automated spam bot

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 30 2012 @ 08:01 AM EDT

>If an automated spam bot can put together a well-written argument like
that,

Coming soon to your spambox.

More seriously, I've seen computer software write three point sermons for
ministers to use. Sermons that include at least two topical references to
something in pop culture, an illustration from the twentieth century, and some
Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic linguistic analysis for those who feel a need to cite
the original language.

The major difference between the sermons produced by that software, and the ones
from TV evangelists, is that they lack the appeal to send in a love offering of
US$10,000.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )