Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

An old belief that has been true over and over | 276 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

True about the block list.

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 03:12 AM EDT

I got the block treatment on twitter for politely posting a
link to a news article containing a direct quote taken
first hand from a juror which contradicted his analysis
of what the jury thought and said.

He's broadcast only, there is literally no point in
engaging with his lies. Frankly I think he may be an
automated spam bot.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Automated spam bot - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 05:40 AM EDT
- Automated spam bot - Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 11:52 AM EDT
  - Automated spam bot - Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 07:48 PM EDT
    - Automated spam bot - Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 08:10 PM EDT
      - Automated spam bot - Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 09:34 PM EDT
  - Automated spam bot - Authored by: Scott_Lazar on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 08:18 PM EDT
- Automated spam bot - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 30 2012 @ 08:01 AM EDT

An old belief that has been true over and over

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 09:59 AM EDT

This is no surprise to anyone who has looked at human nature.

Those who accuse their spouse of cheating continuously are
most probably cheating themselves.

Those who accuse others of stealing are most likely stealing
themselves.

Those who accuse others of lying... well?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Regarding liars..... - Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, July 25 2012 @ 07:55 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )