|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 24 2012 @ 11:53 AM EDT |
One creative judge made the Lawyers pay when the shell company
they representd lost and disolved.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 24 2012 @ 01:01 PM EDT |
It is utterly ridiculous that Google should pay for Oracle-
generated costs in issues that it won; it did not seek a
lawsuit. Oracle did. It did not infringe, as Oracle claimed.
To do anything less than award costs is to encourage
frivolous claims and lawsuits with the purpose of costing
another money. What's worse is that Google can't claim for
the time and effort it spent defending itself, or the damage
caused to its name by all the Oracle-inspired press. I
understand that Google has the money to pay, but not all
defendants do.
I'm not sure about plaintiffs posting a bond: the courts
should not only be for the rich, but perhaps this could work
if the boundaries were very carefully drawn. I do like the
idea of law companies bearing some costs on occasion. At the
moment it sometimes seems like law companies win, no matter
who else ends up ruined. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Absolutely agree - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 24 2012 @ 01:22 PM EDT
|
|
|
|