decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The Philosophical Perspective | 756 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Philosophical Perspective
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 20 2012 @ 11:20 PM EDT
Another thought:

If you teach the man Chinese, he will internalize the
rules (mostly heuristics, really) that would have to be
written down as part of the System. He will then be able to
apply them as fast as the Chinese speakers.

The funny thing about this example is that we say that a
person "understands" language once they can perform a
linguistic task completely unconsciously. At that point
they no longer have any idea *how* they do it. Perhaps this
is why "understanding" seems so magically different from the
application of algorithms.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Philosophical Perspective
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 20 2012 @ 11:44 PM EDT
Correction, my "fundamental criticism" is made on the
Stanford page under the rubric "Other Minds Reply". Searle's
response ("we presume it") is completely unsatisfactory.

My view is also closely related to the "Intuition Reply"
which to me is merely an elaboration of why the Other Minds
Reply poses a valid question.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )