|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 19 2012 @ 03:42 PM EDT |
> back in the day when programming a computer was done
> by jumpering wires between connectors,
Has this argument been used in any of the case law?
That should really hammer it between the eyes of judges
and attorneys. You buy a machine to do job A. It's Model X
and your employees wire the jumpers in pattern (a).
Your competitor wants a machine to do job B. He buys
a Model X and his employees wire the jumpers in pattern (b).
Who created the "new" machine?
Does the jumper wiring have any more legal rights than
a sewing pattern?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 20 2012 @ 04:44 AM EDT |
Has anyone tried that argument: It can't make it a new machine, or my computer
would be several thousand different machines at the same time. Look at it, I
only have one computer sitting there.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|