|
Authored by: PolR on Thursday, July 19 2012 @ 11:10 PM EDT |
While I understand and applaud the attempt to shift patent
law out
of the computer science domain, the argument above
can be modified slightly to
produce an absurd result (at
least absurd under current patent
law.)
The argument works fine as is. Please don't modify it in
absurd ways.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 20 2012 @ 06:27 PM EDT |
by the designer of the computer, quite explicitly.
In contrast, the fancy arrangement of the aluminum was not anticipated by the
designer of the aluminum ingot.
No slippery slope, just the basic principle that you don't get to patent
something *someone else invented*.
The software patent scum are LEECHES. They are attempting to patent things
which were, fundamentally, developed by the inventors of the computer --
combined with completely unpatentable abstract ideas.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|