Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Another Lawyer is born... | 756 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Another Lawyer is born...

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 24 2012 @ 12:50 PM EDT

By MY argument? No. By YOUR argument.

I'm not the one saying the machine is new with every clock cycle. I'm saying,
for EXAMPLE, the machine is new when the software is "installed" onto
the machine. For the nit that is going to say that the hard drive can be
somewhere remote and that the machine loads one instruction at a time I say that
the "machine" is now defined as including the remote program source.

If you insist that for some reason that the assertion that a million different
machines are involved must be maintained for some logical consistency, fine, as
the owner of each of those million machines you are infringing as each one
contributes to the infringement or because the million machines in combination
are an equivalent to the claimed machine and encompassed by the claim.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Another Lawyer is born... - Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, July 24 2012 @ 01:30 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )