|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 16 2012 @ 04:17 PM EDT |
JMOJPBA
In My Opinion, it's Judgement as a Matter Of Judge's Personal Bank Account more
like
Yeah I said it, someone ought to be doing audits on his, his spouses, his kids
out through 3rd cousin twice removed as well as their 250 closest friends, cuz
something is fishy here.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 16 2012 @ 11:17 PM EDT |
Judgement as a matter of judge's personal opinion. It may be that he
simply
denies the possibility of anticompetitive behavior ever occuring. The
almight
market could never allow such a thing, after all. Or maybe he was
bribed.
Maybe the bribe is the feeling of power he gets when he writes his own
laws.
Maybe he actually got money from Microsoft. Either way, it is certainly
not
judgement as a matter of LAW. Do you have any idea of the number
of Microsoft antitrust cases he has presided over?
Do you have any idea
how he's come across in them?
Sure, there have been claims that he's
been clearly biased -- cle
arly biased against Microsoft, that is.
He's made some unusual
statement from the bench, I suppose. Most judges probably wouldn't claim Microsoft going after Java was like Tonya Harding crippling Nancy
Kerrigan before a skating competition. Is that so bad, though.?
It's
true that he didn't want to let people and schools collect $1 billion from
Microsoft as part of settlement of a class action antitrust lawsuit. Why?
Because it wasn't
enough.
Yes, he has been overturned in Microsoft antitrust cases
before, but before this case it was because he kept going overboard against
Microsoft.
Why is it that all ignored now? How can you say, "It may be
that he simply
denies the possibility of anticompetitive behavior ever
occurring." If so, why has he been going after Microsoft's anticompetitive
behavior in so many cases for so many years?
If you want a resource for
Judge Motz's cases, dio
gratia provided this link to the New York Times coverage of his cases.
Not all of them are Microsoft antitrust case, but quite a few of them are. Or
just use Google. There is plenty of information available. Some people would
rather ignore it because they would rather whine, though.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 12:25 AM EDT |
is there a way for an appeal court to initiate an investigation on this judge?
It is one thing if he rules like that (and flied from Maryland to try the case)
just because he believes in a free market. He is free to believe in whatever he
wants. But if the reason for that is that he was bribed, it is a very different
thing, [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
