I haven't found the original yet, but Novell makes reference to the result in their Memorandum in Opposition to Microsoft's Renewed Motion for Judgement as a Matter of Law. From the Introduction,

Applying the proper standard to the facts in the record, it is beyond debate that a reasonable jury could find in Novell's favor. As the Court and the parties know, 11 out of 12 jurors who heard the evidence at trial were prepared to find in Novell's favor. All 12 jurors agreed that Microsoft had engaged in anticompetitive conduct and that Novell had proved causation (Questions 1 through 3 on the verdict form). There is certainly no basis to conclude that these jurors were unreasonable.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

• It's also in the ruling - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 03:55 PM EDT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]