decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
EU opens Microsoft antitrust probe over browser choice | 185 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Google’s Marissa Mayer Becomes Yahoo’s Chief
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 01:04 AM EDT
No link. What I would like to see from a Google press release ...

"We need better competition than Microsoft provides. We hope Marissa does
an outstanding job at Yahoo."

--

Bondfire

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Valve bringing Steam engine to Linux
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 08:31 AM EDT
http://blogs.valves oftware.com/linux/steamd-penguins

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

EU opens Microsoft antitrust probe over browser choice
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 09:58 AM EDT

Couple of comments on the article:

Microsoft is accused of not offering the screen since February 2011 when the software giant issued Windows 7 with Service Pack 1
Would I be surprised to find out it was a deliberate choice to ship without the required browser selection? Nope!

Would I be surprise to find out Microsoft decided to play loose and fast with their requirement? Nope!

This will be the first time the Commission had dealt with a company that had failed to meet requirements under a previous antitrust ruling
Wasn't it also a first that Microsoft had to be fined for dragging their heals in producing the documentation? Microsoft, it appears, will get a few "first" medals from the Commission having to deal with them methinks.
While we have taken immediate steps to remedy this problem, we deeply regret that this error occurred and we apologize for it
The only thing I believe Microsoft is apologizing for is: getting caught!

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )