decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The timing of the announcement | 170 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The timing of the announcement
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, July 16 2012 @ 08:17 AM EDT

I think Nokia was "bought", lock, stock, and barrel, by Microsoft's offer of billions of dollars in payments. The pitch would be "You can't lose selling devices running Microsoft software - the best known name in the world." There was probably advance knowledge/discussion of the long term goal - Metro converging with the desktop. There was the offer of a close relationship, where Nokia gets input into OS design, gets dispensation to modify the hardware specs to some degree. Really, for someone naive it would appear an attractive offer.

Just looking at the deal superficially: Well-known software giant Company X makes this kind of offer, who could turn it down? The problem was, Company X is Microsoft, and you can't trust them, and their track record in phones has gone off the track. Nokia was seduced like a sucker at a carnival. They bought the snake oil from the huckster, but it didn't cure their gout.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The timing of the announcement
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 16 2012 @ 01:33 PM EDT
I imagine that Microsoft was lobbying Nokia's board and Nokia's larger investors
to put Microsoft's man at the helm. Microsoft was looking for a hardware
partner, and Nokia was ideal from Microsoft's perspective. So, the investors
could have been unhappy with the current situation, and Microsoft was going
around talking up their candidate. The investors would likely feel that having a
senior Microsoft man in charge of Nokia would make sure that Nokia's voice would
be sure to be heard at Microsoft.

What makes the choice of Elop so bizarre is that he had no experience in either
the mobile or consumer electronics market. He only made sense from the
perspective of his connections with Microsoft. However, the major investors
would know even less about these markets but would be receptive to lobbying by
senior executives from a large company like Microsoft.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )