decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
who used the word 'impossible?' | 141 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
who used the word 'impossible?'
Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 10:06 PM EDT
I have no doubt that it's possible, but I also have no doubt
that decoupling IE from Win is not as trivial as it was for
Win95. My preference, of course, is to decouple the PC from
Windows :D

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

That would not be enough
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 12:01 PM EDT
The lingering IE code would still respond happily to file://-protocol requests,
and will be run automatically for any content type that's hard-associated with
IE, like .mmc plugins or HTML help. The malware payloads can easily be delivered
by other apps that DO have network connectivity (e.g. saved email attachments or
downloads from another browser), or via an infected removable drive, and
probably in other ways that I can't think of off the top of my head.

IE doesn't need a network connection to pwn you. It only needs to exist, and
for the OS to be programmed to ALWAYS run it (no exceptions) in certain
circumstances. MS essentially guarantees those two criteria to be true.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Win95
Authored by: jonathon on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 01:45 PM EDT
>the removal of the specific portion which performs http/https connections
would result in the effective functional removal of the browser.

I removed MIE from Win2K. Whilst I didn't have any issues with the software I
normally used, I did run into problems installing software that required a
browser, and would, in theory, be able to use any browser. Renaming Firefox
"MIE" did solve some of those problems, but not all of them.

There is a lot more software in the Windows world that requires MIE to be
present, with http/https connectivity setup, than one would expect.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )