decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
griping | 141 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
griping
Authored by: mcinsand on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 02:21 PM EDT
I still have a big gripe with the whole thing not going far enough even if MS
had complied. Unless I'm misunderstanding, the choice window only affected
default browser choice. IE is not deinstalled and removed from the computer if
a user chooses, say, Firefox. That's a problem. A lot of people choose !EI
simply for security reasons, but having it present is still a security risk.
Integrating a browser into the operating system guarantees insecurity, even if
the user is defaulting to a different browser. As some pointed out when the EU
was discussing the choice window, IE is still there and handling some processes
because of the nature of Windows' architecture.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft Admits It Hasn’t Complied with EU Antitrust Order Since February 2011
Authored by: luvr on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 02:28 PM EDT
I have also recently installed a fresh Windows 7 system for someone who doesn't quite feel ready to dump Windows completely (even though they do dual-boot with a Linux system).

I, too, was surprised that the browser ballot screen didn't appear. I installed Firefox anyway—these people wouldn't be happy if I told them that they had to use Internet Explorer from now on. Since I don't really care about the browser ballot screen anyway, it didn't even occur to me to complain—though, come to think of it, perhaps I should have considered doing so.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft Admits It Hasn’t Complied with EU Antitrust Order Since February 2011
Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, July 17 2012 @ 04:03 PM EDT
I bought a new ThinkPad back in October. It came with Windows 7, but I don't
recall getting that choice. However, that didn't stop me from adding Linux as
well as Firefox, Seamonkey, OpenOffice, etc.

---
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is
advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )