|
| Authored by: designerfx on Thursday, July 12 2012 @ 10:21 AM EDT |
remember how they judge literally flew out, literally said "I
want to have a part in this"?
The question of vested interests by the judge hasn't been
investigated well enough.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 12 2012 @ 11:38 AM EDT |
hailing from the EU i havent got an idea whether this is actually possible in
the US, so i'd like to put the question forward - maybe those knowledgeable
could explain:
- can a judge be impeached in the US judicial system?
- if yes: what are the rules for this?
- who is responsible/can initiate something like that?
- what would be the implications for this trial?
thanks :)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: mcinsand on Thursday, July 12 2012 @ 04:02 PM EDT |
If MS is allowed to make claims of Novell's inaction while Novell is not allowed
present documented evidence to the contrary, does that give a good ground for
appeal? MS opened the door of Novell's behavior being relevant, so it seems
like they would be obligated to show any documentation that applies. More
pointedly, the judge would require that Novell provide any information on
activity or lack thereof when MS' behavior was quashing competition.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 13 2012 @ 10:15 AM EDT |
I think there is enough evidence that the judge is not allowing Novell present
its' case. Quite honestly this judge should be investigated and brought before
an ethics board.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
