decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Verizon wants to activate some RFCs | 174 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Verizon wants to activate some RFCs
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 12 2012 @ 05:08 PM EDT
I'm not sure which ones they have in mind,
but just to provoke the chattering classes there could be something in
1633 2386 2474 2990 3662 5432 5462 5777

Note that back in 1994 (ยง2.1) there were doubts that
  • Bandwidth will be infinite
  • Simple priority is sufficient
  • Applications can adapt
We conclude that there is an inescapable requirement
for routers to be able to reserve resources, in order to
provide special QoS for specific user packet streams,
or "flows". This in turn requires flow-specific state
in the routers, which represents an important and
fundamental change to the Internet model.
ibid

If you have another answer please speak up.
There are more parties than Verizon interested in this.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )