decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Win 7 SLT (refund policy) | 335 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Good luck...
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, July 10 2012 @ 01:27 PM EDT
In the UK, just go to Trading Standards. Point out that the shop and
manufacturer are dodging your legal rights by finger pointing.

The result will probably be a very quick refund from the shop, as I believe the
legal situation is "you have a contract with the shop". It's then
their problem to kick up a fuss with the manufacturer (same rule), who will then
have to argue with MS.

Trading Standards will probably just ignore the EULA but it's a very stupid
retailer who ignores Trading Standards.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Win 7 SLT (refund policy)
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10 2012 @ 03:03 PM EDT

MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS

WINDOWS 7 PROFESSIONAL

By using the software, you accept these terms. If you do not accept them, do not use the software. Instead, contact the manufacturer or installer to determine its return policy. You must comply with that policy, which might limit your rights or require you to return the entire system on which the software is installed.

microsoft.com

Clearly, Microsoft wants nothing to do with their product if you don't want it.
My guess is that the manufacturer/installer must pay, since they are probably bulk licensing.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Good luck...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 11 2012 @ 03:31 PM EDT
Not exactly the right place, but someone here might now the answer to this.

I'm in the US near DC, and I'm starting to be in the market for a linux machine.
I haven't decided if I want a laptop to replace my macbook air or a desktop to
use remotely.

I won't buy a machine with secure boot.
I won't buy a machine that comes with Windows.
I need a modern full powered machine.

Anyone have any suggestions?

(The reason I switched from linux to the mac in the first place was that I got
tired of having to upgrade a ton of packages to just install one piece of
software. The mac app bundles are a great feature. But now I want updated
versions of some free software, and it's just too much work to try to get them
going on the mac.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )