Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

(d) | 335 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Advertise reversals?

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10 2012 @ 12:15 PM EDT

I'm not sure, but I think that usually, when the Supreme Court reverses and
remands a case that has come to it from a a circuit court of appeals, the remand
is actually directed back to the district court where the original case was
heard, so the remand and reversal has no effect on the circuit court other than
they most likely get some sort of official notice that it occurred.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Advertise reversals? - Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, July 10 2012 @ 01:12 PM EDT

(d)

Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, July 10 2012 @ 01:10 PM EDT

In this case, just throw out the Appeals Court ruling as "so bad it isn't
even wrong".

Then the District Court ruling will stand unchallenged, with Supreme Court
precedent to back it up.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

(e) - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Wednesday, July 11 2012 @ 02:18 AM EDT
- (f) - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 11 2012 @ 08:32 AM EDT
  - (f) - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Wednesday, July 11 2012 @ 06:01 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )