Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Prince anyone? | 210 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

dutch boy plugging dam with finger

Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 08 2012 @ 05:02 AM EDT

Universal will have to fight this tooth and nail. Both for their own as well as
for their fellow content distributors' sakes.
This communist conspiracy to rob poor media companies must be met no matter the
cost. If artist took their IP and left the reservation, what would these
companies be left with?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Prince anyone?

Authored by: jjs on Sunday, July 08 2012 @ 08:10 AM EDT

>I guess (well I hope so) that they own the 'Def Leopard'
tradmark

When Prince became "that cute symbol that everyone refers to
as 'The Artist Formerly Known as Prince'" it was due to his
own name being trademarked and owned by the studios. One of
the many ways the studios use to control the artists and
ensure the studios get the lion's share of the money.

---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Prince anyone? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 08 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT
- Don't see the disagreement - Authored by: jjs on Sunday, July 08 2012 @ 07:46 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )