decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Prediction! Google joins Samsung at least on "Universal Search" Patent! | 210 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Prediction! Google joins Samsung at least on "Universal Search" Patent!
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 09 2012 @ 04:49 PM EDT
No Dominic did not write the patent. It was written in 2000
when every single Operating System and Search Engine
wantabee was trying to replicate BeOS phenomenally fast Live
Real Time search tools withing Tracker's FIND tools. But
none of them realized it wasn't that easy on other file
systems that could not behave like virtual databases.

Consequently they all had to go with running periodic
maintenance to keep these virtual database systems up to
date on NTFS, EXT2, HFS+, because they did not natively
support database style live "Queries" like BFS did.

So there really is no "Unversal Search" tool that fulfills
this patent except Tracker FIND on BeOS. The rest require
constant maintenance and only work in certain situations on
certain kinds of files. That's why Spotlight on either Apple
platform is limited and therefore can not be said to fulfill
their own patent that was granted in 2004 only because the
USPTO was so busy, it never thoroughly vetted it's patent
claims.

Dominic had nothing to do with that. He only helped make
Spotlight more like BeOS's true "Universal Live Query Search
tools. It's a shame that Apple gets away with this for sure.
The patent should never have been granted in the place,
because prior art was all over the place and it all sprang
from this BeOS developer's file system expertise on BFS and
Tracker!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )