|
Authored by: complex_number on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 03:16 AM EDT |
It might be but as PJ is always reminding us, it depends upon the wording of the
patent.
Always read the fine print.
BTW, Apple are not alone here. There are a huge number of patents that are so
similar to something already out there is seems silly until you read the words
in the patent. The description makes it unique and thus is worthy of being
granted a patent until such time as the various patents offices come to their
senses and put a stop to this silliness.
---
Ubuntu & 'apt-get' are not the answer to Life, The Universe & Everything which
is of course, "42" or is it 1.618?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 08:16 PM EDT |
March 22, 1993.
Peter H. Salus (not logged in)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 11:44 PM EDT |
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/05/us-apple-google-judge-idUSBRE8640IQ201
20705?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm
_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+reuters%252FtechnologyNews+%2528Reuters+
Technology+News%2529
stage_v
from under the bridge[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|