decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Clickie | 334 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Cisco locks customers out of their own routers, only lets them back in if they agree to being sp
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 08:11 AM EDT
I don't recommended LinkSys gear to clients now. I had a disastrous experience
with four ADSL/VPN boxes with the Cisco-badged firmware. Ultimately they were
just not fit for purpose. Never worked properly for longer than a few hours and
several times even rebooted and wiped their configs.

Unfortunately the best fix was to replace them with more expensive Cisco boxes.
If I were a nasty suspicious type I'd wonder whether that's Cisco's policy.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Clickie
Authored by: hardmath on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 09:20 AM EDT

Link

I have a vintage Linksys router, probably from shortly after they were acquired by Cisco, and so far no problems. However I'd seen this reported on Google+ and was thinking about linking it in here.

My feeling is that Cisco has crossed a line and will get unwanted attention from the Justice Dept. It's just way too intrusive on private communications for a private company.

Unless, of course, they did it at the government's request (insert paranoia tags as appropriate).

---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem prover." -- Richard O'Keefe

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Just install dd-wrt on them.
Authored by: Kilz on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 09:57 AM EDT
dd-wrt is a Linux based firmware alternative that adds features. Its real nice and relitivly easy to install.

Link

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I guess Cisco learned from Sony
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 09:58 AM EDT

They too updated customer owned hardware with new firmware in a way that was detrimental to the consumer. But going to Court showed Sony - and others - there's nothing to fear for such an act.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Cisco locks customers out of their own routers, only lets them back in if they agree to being sp
Authored by: Patrick Corrigan on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 11:02 PM EDT
I bought the Asus RT-N16 specifically because it supported all the features of
open source, Linux-based TomatoUSB firmware. I am extremely happy with this
router and firmware.

This story gives me another reason to avoide Cisco and Linksys products.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )