decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Shuttleworth says... | 474 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Shuttleworth says...
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, July 03 2012 @ 07:47 PM EDT
I should have said SFLC is Eben Moglen, who provided legal
counsel for the GPL3. If he is of the opinion that FSF could
require Ubuntu to disclose their private keys, then I trust
that opinion more than I trust a whitepaper from the FSF
which says that they can't imagine why they would require
disclosure.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Shuttleworth says...
Authored by: tknarr on Tuesday, July 03 2012 @ 08:46 PM EDT

Do you have a URL for what the SFLC told Shuttleworth? I know what Shuttleworth said, but I notice he didn't say explicitly which key would have to be disclosed. And that's an important bit, in my example where I'm not distributing your modifications I'm sure the SFLC would say that your source code would have to be provided but that's not the same as saying that I have to provide it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )