decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It's not on the radar | 474 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Secure Boot sounds perfect
Authored by: jbb on Tuesday, July 03 2012 @ 06:12 PM EDT
I think this is a great feature for the situation you describe just as long as the owner of the system can customize Secure Boot by using their own security keys. This should make the enterprise security you are talking about easier. They use their own security key pair and only sign software they want to be running on their systems.

If they are also given the option to disable Secure Boot entirely then I don't see how it would be a problem even if my rosy projection above is flawed.

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Secureboot is not required on servers yet N/T
Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, July 03 2012 @ 07:12 PM EDT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Re-installing OS to reach trusted state
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, July 03 2012 @ 11:34 PM EDT
Sounds great on paper, but if the machine
ever had Windows on it, wiping the disk and
reinstalling does not preclude the possibility
of a backdoor residing in the firmware somewhere.


---

You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"I wonder why...."
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 04 2012 @ 03:59 PM EDT
Are not aware or don't understand what lurks?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It's not on the radar
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, July 06 2012 @ 01:26 PM EDT
Most businesses and government offices are still on the XP to 7 cycle. They
probably will not take notice for many years yet and skip 8 entirely. If this
experiment fails, no problem. There is still the expected flashback by
consumers and their supporting techs for MS and the others to deal with over
this change.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )