Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

GPL is right...but the fundamental technical details of its security are wrong.... | 474 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

GPL is right...but the fundamental technical details of its security are wrong....

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 05 2012 @ 08:53 PM EDT

That is, if I OWN the system, not only do I have GPL code running the OS...with
a BETTER security model than Linux or even Android....

The OS offers limits on everything every bit of code, from whatever source, can
do on the system, and they are limits I can comprehend, and includes such things
as "honey pots" for programs that misbehave. (So my advertising
programs all think I live at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue (grin))

Right now, with 1 million lines in the Linux kernel, it's too big. You simply
cannot inspect it yourself. Linux "capabilities" aren't the right
model, not the complete model, anyway. This is my point. We need something
that is both comprehensive and convenient (admittedly a hard balance).

(Christenson)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )