decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Depends on whether or not Canonical distributes signed upgrades for the hardware | 474 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Depends on whether or not Canonical distributes signed upgrades for the hardware
Authored by: pem on Monday, July 02 2012 @ 07:00 PM EDT
If they do, GPL v3 would seem to require them to make sure the key is available, not the OEM.

This may or may not be true, but nothing in the "response" from the FSF seems to address this concern, so my money is on it being true and the FSF studiously ignoring it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The OEM doesn't have or need Canonical's private key, just one of they can provide
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 02 2012 @ 10:16 PM EDT
The OEM is free to preload a third public key and give out the private key for that, which would allow the owner of the computer to compile software and sign it so it could run. Or to provide a way for the owner of the computer to generate their own key and load it.
From the article:
It's also a problem because the Windows 8 Logo program currently mandates Restricted Boot on all ARM systems, which includes popular computer types like tablets and phones. It says that users must not be able to disable the boot restrictions or use their own signing keys.
So if I'm Dell and want to create a custom BIOS for my device that allows for other keys, I could do that. But if I'm an company that is taking a Dell device and adding on Ubuntu, I can't create additional keys.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )