decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
when is a tax not a tax? Misses the Point | 212 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
when is a tax not a tax? Misses the Point
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 29 2012 @ 09:23 PM EDT
The issues before the court were:

Legal Challenges to the Affordable Care Act
Reference:
http://www.hfma.org/Templates/Print.aspx?id=24263

Update: Supreme Court Grants Review of Healthcare Law Challenges

The Supreme Court has granted review of four issues from challenges to the
Affordable Care Act that have been pursued in the federal courts since passage
of the act in March 2010. The court originally set aside 5 1/2 hours for oral
argument (arguments at the court are typically restricted to one hour, with each
side granted a half-hour of argument), but has expanded the total argument time
to 6 hours, spread over three days (March 26, 27, and 28, 2012). The four issues
on which the court has granted review are:

Whether the Anti-Injunction Act prevents challenges to the Affordable Care Act
at this time (90 minutes of argument on March 26)

The constitutionality of the individual mandate, requiring most Americans to
purchase health insurance by 2014 (2 hours of argument on March 27)

Whether the individual mandate is severable if it is found to be
unconstitutional, or whether the entire Act would have to fail (90 minutes of
argument on March 28)

Whether the Affordable Care Act's expansion of the Medicaid program is
constitutional (1 hour of argument on March 28)

The issue of the applicability of the Affordable Health Care (ObamaCare) as a
tax issue was not one of the four issues before the court.

In fact that issue can not be brought before any federal court before the tax is
paid. I believe this comes about because of the 16 Amendment but it could be
another amendment such as poll tax. Under either case the tax payment issue was
not argued before the supreme court as part of the Affordable Care Act.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )