|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 29 2012 @ 06:04 PM EDT |
Sorry but you certainty are missing it in that my posting does not refer to a
legal thought flow but it does refer to a logic and political thought flow of
what is happening, how and why.
For a more detail process flow see the 12 point sequence posted above.
To fully appreciate this one must realize that the ruling gutted the individual
mandate based on the commerce clause while upholding it based on the ability to
tax only because the tax question was not before the court and could not come
before the court until after someone has paid the tax and sued for relief and
that this can not happen for at least 2 years.
To rephrase the mandate as a tax is legal as long as it is not used but the
minute it is used a court action will be filed against it and it will be deemed
unconstitutional.
Next ObamaCare appearance tentatively scheduled for 2017 at which time ObamaCare
as a tax will be declared unconstitutional.
Not only that but if the tax issue were removed from the ObamaCare opinion and
the individual mandate declared unconstitutional there would be riots in the
street but with the tax issue included the court has the radical left praising
the right for complete and total destruction of ObamaCare.
ObamaCare is more dead today than if the court had simply declared the
individual mandate unconstitutional from the commerce clause as this procedure
gives the court a second chance, a second byte at the apple, to declare
ObamaCare dead as a tax issue.
Obama really should not have stuck it to the court in that joint session of
congress and he would not find himself having to praise the court for complete
and total destruction of ObamaCare.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
