decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Is ObamaCare moral? | 212 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Is ObamaCare moral?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 30 2012 @ 08:11 AM EDT

ObamaCare and the politics of dependency
By Dr. Keith Ablow
Published June 29, 2012
FoxNews.com
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/06/29/obamacare-and-politics-dependency/

The cost of ObamaCare pales, economically or in terms of quality of care, in my
opinion, in comparison to what President Obama's health care law will cost our
country, in terms of mindset.

Here's why: The notion of an individual mandate, that is forcing Americans to
buy something with their after-tax dollars (or pay a fine), can make citizens
see themselves as serfs who actually have no right at all to the money they
earn, and keep it only when it suits the federal government.

Money is a metaphor: Take away the right to determine what people do with their
earned, after-tax income and you will take away their self-confidence,
self-determination, creativity and courage to act on their beliefs and their
ideas.

An American citizen who willingly allows the federal government to earmark his
or her after-tax income and direct it to insurance companies is an American
citizen who has decided that the government "knows best." The federal
government is, from that moment forward, (in at least some measure) that
citizen's parent, leaving them only with an allowance, consisting of what's left
after they buy what their "parents" in Washington tell them to.

Every human being knows in his or her heart that the ability to earn a living
and make decisions about the money that flows to him or her is one of the
hallmarks of an autonomous life.

Children and adolescents dream of the day when they will "have their own
money," because they understand that the roots of the monetary/financial
system reach deep into sacred notions of individual choice and freedom. Take
that decision-making capacity away from the individual, and you risk
slingshotting him or her back to a pre-adolescent stance. You infantilize that
person.

Seen this way, the individual mandate is, therefore, another in those forces
unleashed by President Obama--along with lots of food stamps and lots of
unemployment payments and lots of bailouts--which encourages adult Americans to
turn to their government for nurturance, and to become angry at perceived
oppressors when they feel unfulfilled.

If you think that Occupy Wall Street was a spectacle, just wait and see how tens
of millions of adult children, who have been told they can't decide how to spend
their money, behave when their allowance dries up.

Seen through this "We the Parents" lens, rather than "We the
People," it should be obvious that ObamaCare is a terrifying trap. Under
the guise of "helping" and "healing" and "caring"
for Americans, it reminds them how vulnerable they are to illness. Under the
guise of "fairness," it takes away their financial decision-making
capacity. In true Progressive fashion, it makes people regress and feel as
though they don't know best how to manage their health or their affairs. It
renders them weak.

Deep inside, people despise being weak. It is an affront to their God-given
rights to SELF-determination and the pursuit of happiness. Hence, the stance of
federal government as parent that sits so well with President Obama opens the
door to depression and all manner of ills (including drug abuse) that afflict
those who feel disempowered.

With Egypt in the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood, with Iran building nuclear
weapons and with Europe facing economic calamity, the last thing we need are
lessons from Washington in how to be weak individuals. Because courage comes
from deep inside, from each adult American in this nation it will, ultimately,
be the only thing that stands between us and calamity. The individual mandate of
ObamaCare is a virus that could destroy that good psychological DNA.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team. Dr.
Ablow can be reached at info@keithablow.com

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )