decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Seized HDD inadmissable if illegally seized | 88 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Seized HDD inadmissable if illegally seized
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 29 2012 @ 12:20 AM EDT
> Presumably this NZed rulling now means that Dot Com will not be
> forced by the NZ legal system to disclose his decryption keys

Possibly not, probably not

> and presumably his HDD must now be returned.

Since the Feds have the HDs now in the US Dotcom will have to hope
that the VA court respects the law of NZ. I'm not holding my breath on that.
Also the longer Dotcom drags out the extradition proceedings, the longer
the Feds have to work on decrypting the drive. [No, I don't know what
encryption was used, nor how long that would take to crack with
the FBI budget] Another question of course is supposing they don't
crack it, and just quietly destroy it, where are the backups?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Seized HDD inadmissable if illegally seized
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 29 2012 @ 07:02 PM EDT
Unfortunately most hard disks have known structures. This makes it easy to find
decryption keys. I wouldn't be surprised if they have already figured out a few
of them. Stick a few high end graphics cards in a server box and you have a box
capable of brute force breaking most encryption.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )