decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
News Picks Thread: Gilmor | 88 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Google+ News Picks, in a walled Garden!?
Authored by: celtic_hackr on Thursday, June 28 2012 @ 08:28 AM EDT
There is a Newspick up here, which is only viewable if you are logged into and
have an account with Google+!

What's up with that!? This is as bad as throwing up a NY Times registration
required to view newspick. At least warn us when News pick are only viewable to
the "select few". I don't have Google+ account, and see no reason to
get one. At least not yet.

Too bad, it looked like an interesting article.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

News Picks Thread: Gilmor
Authored by: cc0028 on Thursday, June 28 2012 @ 08:28 AM EDT

Clicking on the link to this article gives me the following message:

No se ha encontrado esta publicación. Es posible que tu URL sea incorrecta, que la publicación se haya eliminado o que esta cuenta no tenga acceso a la publicación.

(i.e. the article isn't found)

Cheers

PAE

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Dotcom search warrants ruled illegal
Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, June 28 2012 @ 08:31 AM EDT

An outrageous injustice was perpetrated upon Kim Dotcom by the NZ police. The article makes no mention of reparations. How can Kim Dotcom be made whole again once copies of his hard drives had already been illegally sent to the FBI? Is there any way to prevent them from being used against Dotcom in the USA?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

SWAT tries to take down Internet meanie; raids grandma instead
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 28 2012 @ 01:18 PM EDT
Gotta wonder what these guys are thinking. The judge who signed the warrant
must be net-ignorant. Even if the perpetrator WAS caught, the case would be
thrown out (and a really expensive lawsuit could follow). I hope the
grandmother sues...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Blasts Universal in Key Eminem Royalties Case Ruling
Authored by: crs17 on Thursday, June 28 2012 @ 10:12 PM EDT
What poetic justice. The whole computer industry has been telling us for years
that we don't "buy" software, we "license" it. This has
always seemed like a crock of <...>.

Now Eminem has enforced his contract that has a clause saying that licensing
pays at a higher royalty rate than sales. He wanted to collect the licensing
rate for online downloads of his songs. The music publisher tried to say these
weren't licenses but sales.

Finally it comes back to bite someone. They've been playing the consumer for so
long with that legal falsehood. It's great that at least some deserving class
of people (the artists) are using it against the publishers.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

New Google Tablet Gives Lawyers Low-Cost Alternative to Apple iPad
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 29 2012 @ 12:43 AM EDT
Hardly, the screen just is not big enough at 7 inches, but
for mobile use, can fit in a jacket or loose fitting pants,
and be used along with other toys. Also, where is a Pixel Qi
screen Google folks?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

EFF Will Represent The Oatmeal Creator in Fight Against Bizarre Lawsuit Targeting Critical Onlin
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 29 2012 @ 06:43 AM EDT
This is bizarre. However, the fact that such lawsuits are even considered shows
how out of touch the legal system is with reality when it comes to online
content.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )