decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
It is terribly sad | 88 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Actually,
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 27 2012 @ 10:29 AM EDT
I think the current patent apocalypse (Android vs. iPhone,
Oracle vs. Google, trolls vs. world) are the impetus that
will actually lead to getting rid of software patents.

I think The Big Boys with Large Software Patent Portfolios
are finally realizing the system as currently defined is
much more likely to cost them money (products being
embargo'ed, huge legal fees to fight frivolous suits,
unreasonable license fee requests from non-practicing
entities) than make them money (selling or licensing their
own patents).

Patent portfolios are currently "mutually assured
destruction." Oh, you wanna claim I violate one of your
patents? I'm sure there's one of mine in here somewhere
that YOU violate. We're witnessing the breakdown of that
deterrence strategy. And I think companies are starting to
realize disarmament is an attractive alternative.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It is terribly sad
Authored by: hAckz0r on Wednesday, June 27 2012 @ 10:46 AM EDT
They don't make a dime, they only transfer money out of the consumers pocket into a lawyers pocket. Any true inventor rarely sees a dime of it.

---
The Geeks IP Law: The future health of a Corporation is measured as the inverse of the number of IP lawsuits they have filed in the last 3 years.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )