decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
News Picks Thread | 16 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections thread
Authored by: nsomos on Sunday, July 01 2012 @ 10:03 PM EDT
Please post corrections here.
It may be helpful to summarize corrections in the posts title.

Kerrekshuns -> Corrections

Before suggesting a correction to transcript, please check against
the original PDF as errors in the original are not to be corrected.

Thanks

[ Reply to This | # ]

Off Topic threads
Authored by: bugstomper on Sunday, July 01 2012 @ 10:28 PM EDT
Please stay off topic in these threads

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Picks Thread
Authored by: bugstomper on Sunday, July 01 2012 @ 10:44 PM EDT
Please type the title of the News Picks article in the Title box of the comment
that you use to start the thread on the article, and include the link to the
article in the body of your comment, preferably as a clickable link posted in
HTML Formatted Mode for the convenience of the readers once the article has
scrolled off the News Picks sidebar.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Novell v. Microsoft Trial Transcripts, as text - Day 10
Authored by: Ian Al on Tuesday, July 03 2012 @ 03:16 AM EDT
Frankenburg testified that PerfectOffice was not released for other than Windows operating systems. However, we know that was because of the anti-competitive actions of Microsoft. WordPerfect worked as middleware in its own right and Garry Gibb testified about the extend of the cross-platform work going on leading to the Windows 95 version.
Q: Now, when you went to work on the engine team, was the engine team working on 16-bit or 32-bit operating systems?

A: Both. So we worked on 16- and 32-bit. Everything was 32-bit except for Windows. The Windows 3.1 platform was just 16-bit, but we built cross-platforms. So as a developer we would sit down, every one of the developers on the engine team had two computers. So they would have one computer that would be, for example, a NEX computer or OS2 computer, and next to it they would have a Windows machine, so they would have both.

So they would build their code. They would test it on the two platforms before they would check it into a common depository and then work across all the platforms. It was tested every night.

Q: Is it fair to say it began -- before you began work, the engine team began work on the 32-bit product for Windows that you had already been working on 32-bit operating systems?

A: Oh, yeah.

Q: Throughout?

A: I think probably more than half the code, and it was all 32-bit because, like I said, it was cross-platform. And everything under the Windows was 32-bit. So it was certainly 32-bit.
Microsoft say that the complaints about Windows 95 were not made by Frankenburg at the meeting with Dave Miller. However, the Frankenburg complaint was made via the corporate counsel because it was such an important issue.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )