Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

You have to look at what they did. | 305 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

IPwatchdog: New allegations of google copying Java

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 10:53 AM EDT

Wasn't it 9 *lines* of code, possibly included (by reference) in 3000 files.
And all done by a third-party contractor?

Sounds like hit-digging to me.

I'd have thought we'd have found it otherwise, since we value the truth over
teams here.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

IPwatchdog: New allegations of google copying Java - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 02:04 PM EDT

IPwatchdog: New allegations of google copying Java

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 11:41 AM EDT

Ah, Gene Quinn, the champion of "expanded business models" for patent
lawyers ... at the expense of actual people getting busy producing something
someone else would ever want.

Always available for patent trolls who can afford the very most expensive sock
puppets.

Everybody is ALWAYS infringing on his client's preciousssss IP, gollum, gollum.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You have to look at what they did.

Authored by: Kilz on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 12:28 PM EDT

Did they run a computer program or was it a person? Did they
remove from what matched unprotectable elements like names
and such.
What that site seems set up to do is SELL a report. I wouldnt
trust it at all.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )