decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
UEFI and Secure Boot - less Freedom is No Freedom | 305 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
ha. a "toll booth"
Authored by: jesse on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 02:07 PM EDT
When I first read that it scanned as "troll booth"... :)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

UEFI and Secure Boot - less Freedom is No Freedom
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 05:15 PM EDT

It's no possible to completely say this is useless, which I will come to.

The main aim of UEFI and so on is not to provide security, the aim is to support DRM. Essentially, by ensuring that the computer only does what Microsoft wants it to do from the very bottom up, they will be able to secure the computer against it's "owner" (differently put, Microsoft will be able to own what you think is your computer). Everything else; securing the user; even blocking Linux; is just useful side effects.

When it comes to security, this really, actually is a valuable thing. There has been a whole class of anti-virus avoiding "root kits" recently, such as the one from Sony. These worked by being under the operating system where the anti-virus couldn't see and gave long term control of your computer to someone other than yourself and other than Microsoft. Some of these people were even nastier than MS themselves. MS doesn't want other people in control of your computer and UEFI will make life much more difficult for root kits.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )