decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
UEFI and Secure Boot - less Freedom is No Freedom | 305 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
UEFI and Secure Boot - less Freedom is No Freedom
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 06:18 PM EDT
Exactly. If all modules/drivers don't have to be signed then you could just use
kexec to boot an unsigned kernel like they do on Android systems with locked
bootloaders.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

UEFI and Secure Boot - less Freedom is No Freedom
Authored by: Steve Martin on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 07:27 AM EDT

I'm a little confused over driver signing. Once the system is booted do the drivers need to be signed for a device to work?

One bit that I have grasped from this massive spec is that the UEFI scheme is entirely modular, and includes the ability to load "pre-boot-environment" driver files for particular devices, sort of like the "initrd" concept when booting Linux. If, for example, a hardware vendor comes out with a new device (call it a disk) that is not supported by the resident UEFI code, they can also provide a driver file to work with UEFI that will allow the device to be accessed and used during boot (which would let the machine boot from that "disk"). I believe that's the "driver signing" that they're talking about.

Still reading...

---
"When I say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffe, "Sports Night"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Canonical anounced they'll do exactly that [n/t]
Authored by: marcosdumay on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 04:33 PM EDT
No thread, really.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )