decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
One has to wonder if Oracle considered the backlash. | 305 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Oracle's Motion for JMOL, as text -- Oracle Asks to Win Everything It Lost, and More, More, More ~pj
Authored by: Nivag on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 02:23 AM EDT
Give PostgreSQL a try, if appropriate, - Oracle hates, Hates, HATES PostgreSQL.


PostgreSQL 9.2beta2 is out and people started to convert from Oracle to
PostgreSQL back in PostgreSQL version 8 days.

When Oracle took over SUN, they disconnected the servers SUN had allowed
PostgreSQL developers to use for testing, _WITHOUT_ any prior warning.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Department of redundancy department department
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 08:55 AM EDT
"DBMS software" ?

;)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle's Motion for JMOL, as text -- Oracle Asks to Win Everything It Lost, and More, More, More ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 10:59 AM EDT
"The average audience would never even see the comments, actually. I
suppose Oracle would argue the "average audience" would be
developers."

Technically, the average audience *has* to be developers (or would-be
developers), since regular users just use the compiled bytecode and will never
see any of the source.

Sourcecode comments are, IMO, one of the only truly copyrightable things in
code... if someone reproduced something similar (but not identical) to my code,
but included all my comments verbatim, I'd definitely feel infringed.

That said, Oracle is barking up the wrong tree. It's barking pretty loudly, but
the de minimis and other considerations appear to weigh very heavily against it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle's Wants "Danages for Comments"?!?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 02:24 PM EDT
Let me get this straight: Oracle wants damages
because Google copied the comments in a
file?!? So If I say -- make a comment -- that "Oracle is
out of its mind if the hope to collect because Google
copied this quote" I can sue Oracle for copying my
quote?!? If that doesn't take the cake!!! More likely the
comment Google "copied" said something like
"This file is needed to run XYZ, and the results should
be in the range A-Z. The end of life as we know it is
near when we can be sued for coping a quote.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

One has to wonder if Oracle considered the backlash.
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 05:48 PM EDT
This is a case of the events overcoming the premise.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )