Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 01:52 PM EDT |
> Of COURSE you can have your cake and eat it too!
No, it's an archaic use of the word "have". It reads more along the
lines of "still have" - and you can't still have your cake if you've
eaten it.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: rocky on Monday, June 25 2012 @ 02:11 PM EDT |
If people were saying "have your cake and THEN eat it too", I would be
right there fuming with you, but without the time-related word "then",
they are just mentioning two simultaneous conditions joined with the word
"and". There is no logic or illogic to mentioning either one first or
second.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 09:57 AM EDT |
You must have lots of trouble talking to people. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 26 2012 @ 11:54 AM EDT |
What about "Cheap at half the price" ? Would be fine if it ran 'Would be cheap
at half the price' but that's not how it's used. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|